
Title : The Blue
Author: Scott Kelly
Publication Date: December 20, 2012
Purchase Site: Amazon
Derek can't recognize himself in the mirror. He can't recognize his mom, dad or ex-wife, either. He can't, because a head-on collision with a family of three - all dead - has left him with a rare condition called face-blindness.
Things get worse.
The police have charged Derek with vehicular manslaughter. The downtrodden but brilliant painter is stalked by the brother of the family that he killed, an enemy he can never see coming. As the stalker - a troubled ex-marine - grows increasingly violent, Derek's world of strangers is turned on its head. Will his stalker accept anything but death? Will a jury let him go free?
The Blue is a gritty, mind-bending thriller from Scott Kelly, author of the popular e-novel [sic].
Giveaway
Scott Kelly, author of The Blue, is giving away a $30 Amazon gift card!
He's totally one of my favorite authors so don't miss out!
He's totally one of my favorite authors so don't miss out!
Review
![]() |
| Buy on Amazon |
I was eager when author Scott Kelly contacted me to review his latest release, The Blue. I was left stunned by [SIC], so I could not resist. Initially, I was worried that my expectations for the The Blue would be too high. Fortunately, Kelly proved me wrong and has now left me with the hard task of reviewing this book without sounding like a fanatic. I loved it. It comprised of a fast-paced plot that left me on the edge - the epitome of a thriller.
Derek Weaver is your typical aspiring artist who seems to have no ambition in his life. Though he is what many would deem an insignificant slob, he is a very intriguing character. This can be attributed to all the conflicts he has to endure. He has to deal with face-blindness, heavy guilt, a stalker, alcoholism, an ex-wife, a lawsuit, and his overall failures in life. Sounds like an unlucky guy, eh? Thankfully, Kelly did not use Derek's woes to tug at my heart string. A lot of authors attempt to force you to feel sorry for a character to keep your attention. Kelly is a realist, he "ain't got no time for that". Instead, he presents the gritty truth, leaving the reader to neutrally decide how to react. Using this method is what makes books like The Blue a riveting philosophical read.
Since this is a short book, I must say I was impressed with the characters in The Blue. They are not added merely as fillers or entertainers, rather each character is meticulously placed to accentuate the reflective nature of the novel. This is evident in the characterization of Derek's lawyer, Mr. Grayson and his doctor, Eli. These two characters offer their own beliefs of life which leaves room for pondering - something Kelly wants his readers to do. For instance, Mr. Grayson blatantly states his view of life to Derek. He declares: "...there's only one real force in this universe, and that's chaos...Anything can come and ruin your life's work. Life sucks like that, and people don't want to believe it." (Location 1831 of 4777) Not only do these characters portray their stance in their dialogue, but in their actions as well. You can see that especially with Dr. Eli.He's a funny man.
What really made The Blue a gripping read though is its paramount writing style. It is enveloped in first-person narrative which allows readers to experience what it is like to be Derek. His impairment made this perspective even more unique because without recognizing faces he is unable to sense when danger, in the form of a crazed stalker, is right in front of him. At times, I wished I was able to tap him on the shoulder and steer him to safety. I guess that rectifies how attached I became to Derek. Another unique twist is that Derek is also a "bad guy". He is being charged for vehicular manslaughter. This outtake proved to be refreshing as I got to see how it felt to be held responsible for killing innocent people, to be frowned upon for something you vaguely remember. I liked that whenever a surviving relative is introduced, the atmosphere of the book fills with a tension that you can slice. This "victimizer" point of view was interesting.
Another impressive element of The Blue is its expert use of figurative language. Honestly, I really looked forward to this in the book because of its predecessor, [sic]. The eponymous color motif is not hard to miss. It manifests itself in the sky, Derek's memory, and police uniforms. The significance of this motif is probably connected to the moral basis of the story, and I feel that Kelly probably has left it for us to further interpret. There is also compelling imagery. For instance, the description of the accident as it happened left me fearful. It really made the book open with a bang. Then there are the countless metaphors that make the most banal descriptions examples of beautiful prose.
Once again, Kelly has left me questioning human nature, morality and life's spontaneity. What is wrong or right? Do we really need order if life is just a chaotic and deranged symphony? You might ask similar, thoughtful questions after delving into The Blue.
Disclaimer: I received a free copy of this book from the author in exchange for my honest review.
Rating
5 / 5
About the Author
When Scott was eleven, he was so upset by the ending of the classic story Robin Hood that he wrote his own and stuck it into the book. When he was fourteen he finished his first novel. By the time he was nineteen, he’d written four–the latest, JIMWAMBA, was published by an independent press in the United Kingdom. Dissatisfied with the experience, he took to stealing paper from his University and selling staple-bound copies of his manuscript at local festivals and gatherings, earning him a cult following that only grew as his eBook FRIGHTENED BOY reached its thirty-thousandth reader. Scott’s constant need to improve his writing took him through a college education in Literature. He became determined to bring what he loved about classic literature to the modern reader, in a manner they’d appreciate as something new, but with its dues paid.Now twenty-eight, he performs intellectual property duty for a lab where experimental drugs and chemicals are concocted. But while the chemists are busy filling beakers, Scott is trying to save compelling, thought-provoking literature for a new wave of readers.

Wow! Not being able to see faces would be horrible! I would muss being able to see emotions on faces as people are talking to me... to really know what they're feeling!
ReplyDeleteWell that really would suck, but it would get stressful having to be reminded who someone is everytime you see them.
ReplyDeletecfcbc@netzero.com
I would miss looking into people's eyes. The eyes show so much emotion.
ReplyDeleteKit3247(at)aol(dot)com
To see thier reactions to things-it'd be so mucg easier for people to lie to you.
ReplyDeleteThis book sounds amazing! I think the worst thing about being face blind would be not being able to see people's expressions because I like being able to match facial expressions with the words!
ReplyDeleteSuz Reads
I would hate not knowing how people are feeling, since you have no way of seeing their emotions through facial expressions
ReplyDeleteThis book sounds very interesting. I can't image having face-blindness! Not being able to look your loved ones in the eyes would be heart breaking.
ReplyDeleteHurting people close to me by not recognizing them.
ReplyDeleteThe worst thing would be not having a connection with people. Without looking in their eyes, and seeing the the nuances of expression, it would be impossible to "get" the person.
ReplyDeleteI woud miss the smiles on the loved ones
ReplyDeleteThe feeling of disconnection. Not being able to recognize those I care about, and in return hurting them.
ReplyDeleteFace recognition is an essential trait that we have from birth. We connect personally through faces. We essentially would be blind. Would have to relearn how to see through other senses I suppose, but I think would be the hardest would be explaining the condition to everyone and not have them think you made it up and crazy.
ReplyDeleteI have enough trouble remembering names that I would be completely lost without recognising faces.
ReplyDeleteI think the worst thing would be not being able to recognize your children and your significant other. It would be so painful to know that I was hurting them by not recognizing them.
ReplyDeleteredfirewood888(AT)yahoo(DOT)ca
Ollie aka DarkBloodyVamp
That would be completely awful. I couldnt imagine not seeing my neice and nephews faces and not reconizing them. Or anyone that I love. It would be heart wrenching. And very painful for them too I'd imagine.
ReplyDelete-Amber
goodblinknpark(AT)yahoo(DOT)com
The eyes -- the windows to the soul.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't know whom to trust!.. that's an awful situation. Can't even imagine it.
ReplyDeleteI really would have bought a copy but Amazon does not allow Kindle purchases in my country. Not for the 10 points but because it has a killer storyline..
Oh no, Naz! So awful to hear. Can you accept Kindle gifts? I would send one to you, and ask the other to give you your 10 points still. I would love for you to read this book.
Deleteauthor*
DeleteFantastic review by the way!.. Loved reading it :)
ReplyDelete:D Thanks for reading!
DeleteI would be traumatized by being alone, not knowing who to trust.
ReplyDeletebeing faceblind would hurt as i'd be hurting loved ones by not recognising them
ReplyDeleteI would hate the fact that I could no longer look into someone's eyes or watch their facial expressions and see what they are really feeling/thinking.
ReplyDeleteSherri
It would be BEYOND horrible to not be able to recognize those that I love!!! Sounds like an intriguing read.
ReplyDeleteAshley A
ash_app(at)hotmail(dot)com
It would be tragic for me not being able to see my grandchildren how beautiful they are, or handsome.
ReplyDeleteAw, that's sad. I can't even imagine how hard it would be to not see the smiles on peoples faces.
ReplyDeleteThat would be horrible. I wouldn't know who's trustworthy or not and who meant what to me. The good thing about it is seeing people for who they are and not for who I want them to be, but then again it can go the other way too.
ReplyDeleteStudied a little psychology at uni and loved hearing about these bizarre conditions that can affect brain damage patients. I am very intrigued by this story!
ReplyDelete(comments are easier to leave if word verification is turned off in the blog settings)
That sounds absolutely horrible. I can't even imagine what it would be like.
ReplyDeleteI'd need to see their emotions and how they react when I talk. It would be horrible to talk to people and not see their expressions.
ReplyDeleteI have never heard of this condition and also, I like
ReplyDeletehow the author leaves his reader to neutrally read his
book and make decisions...
Many thanks, Cindi
jchoppes[at]hotmail[dot]com
If I were to be faceblind, not be able to see a person's facial
ReplyDeleteexpressions, their soul in their eyes, that would be very difficult
for me!
Thanks, Cindi
jchoppes[at]hotmail[dot]com
It would just feel lonely and you never would really be able to see into a person really. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteIt would be horrible to be faceblind, but hopefully he would be able to put voices and mannerisms to the person, or maybe it doesn't work that way.
ReplyDeleteBonnie Hilligoss/bonhill@speakeasy.net
The feeling of being alone and not knowing who is a friend, family, or enemy.
ReplyDeleteI woud miss the smiles on the people i love
ReplyDeletethanks for the giveaway :)
sunshine_pinkystar(at)yahoo(dot)com
woah this does sound thrilling! face blidness! omg! i will have to check it oute ! Thanks for the review - Katie @ Inkk
ReplyDeleteIt would be hard to develop new friends, I'd think
ReplyDeleteI would imagine that would cause a lot of confusion. I probably wouldn't like that!
ReplyDeletemestith at gmail dot com
The inability to look back at old photos of friends!
ReplyDeleteI would miss the way peoples faces lit up, the way people smiled, and their eyes. Plus I would be scared, because I wouldn't know who to trust. You can tell a lot from a persons face...
ReplyDeleteThe worst thing for me would be that I'm really bad with names, but I remember faces really well. In my Cognitive Psychology course, we learned about face-blindness, and it's such a devastating condition. Some people with variations on the condition even can become confused and think their loved ones are impostors when they see them, because the individual's brain doesn't connect their faces to his or her emotional connections to them. And as a result, the individual thinks they aren't really his or her loved ones. So sad!
ReplyDeleteThe fact that I won't be able to recognize my own family is terrible. Having no one familiar is a sad thing. I don't think I will be happy like that.
ReplyDeleteYou get so much meaning from people's facial expressions, I think it might be hard to communicate. Of course you could hear people and see their body gestures, but think about all those clues faces give...when someone's being sarcastic, lying, etc. But like those who are actually blind, you might pick up almost a 6th sense to make up for being faceblind.
ReplyDeleteNever knowing if the person you're talking to is your best friend or a complete stranger! I would hate that.
DeleteIris Joris
belsuhail@gmail.com
The worst thing would be not knowing who your friends and family are.
ReplyDeleterounder9834 @yahoo.com
Not being able to see my family would be awful.
ReplyDeleteIt would make it very difficult to trust situations or measure danger.
ReplyDeleteUUmmm...I can't really even imagine it. I don't hear well, so it would be a nightmare for me.
ReplyDeleteimpossible to get new friends.
ReplyDeleteIt would be sad to never see my baby's face again. I think it would be a scary world without any one of your senses, especially the one that a majority of the people rely on the most.
ReplyDeleteoddball2003 at hotmail dot com
The hardest thing for me if I couldn't see their faces would be knowing who was around, I wouldn't be able to see my children's faces change as they grow up, I wouldn't be able to see the excitment on Christmas when opening presents or on birthdays.
ReplyDeleteJamie Brigham
PrettyInPinkWife @ aol dot com
You wouldn't know who anybody was! That would be especially hard with family and friends. Thanks for the giveaway and introducing me to this book!!
ReplyDeleteconfusion.
ReplyDeleteNot knowing who is who
ReplyDeletenever knowing who anyone is would be scary - regnod(at)yahoo(d0t)com
ReplyDeletenot knowing who your loved ones look like
ReplyDeleteI think the hardest part would not being able to read emotions. You can find out so much about a person just be looking at their facial expressions.
ReplyDeleteYou can read so much by the expressions on a persons face, I think the worst part about being faceblind would be not being able to read people's reactions.
ReplyDeleteThe worst thing I think would be that you wouldn't remember if you already know the people. If you met them somewhere else, like on the street, you'd just go by and they would think that you're rude, because you didn't greet and talk to them, when you just didn't recognize them. Also, you'd miss a lot of nonverbal communication, like winks or smiles.
ReplyDeletethe worst thing for me would be not knowing my daughter and her kids.
ReplyDeleteThat would be awful. Not being able to see the faces of loved ones...and I'd be constantly afraid of strangers.
ReplyDeleteThe worst thing would not being able to see my loved ones' faces - that would be painful.
ReplyDeleteNot being able to see the faces of my friends and family would make me feel very alone.
ReplyDeleteNot being able to see my daughters smiles
ReplyDeleteCan't recognize them in a crowd to say hello. - Lillian b.
ReplyDeleteI think the worst would be not being able to see people's expressions and recognize people.
ReplyDeleteThe worst thing about being face blind would be forgetting what your loved ones looked like and having to be reminded often.
ReplyDeleteFantasic read!
ReplyDeleteThanks so much!!